The sheer number of people with a strong personal stake in the future of the renminbi is staggering. Laborers in China’s coastal provinces, central bankers around the globe, consumers across the developed world and workers in America’s factories will all feel changes large and small if the Chinese currency regime changes.
Last month, the People’s Bank of China said that it would abandon its current policy, a peg which ties the value of the renminbi to the dollar.
Since then, however, actual movements in the direction of a true floating currency have been vague. The renminbi’s value floats, but only in a narrow “band” that is limited to movements within half a percentage point of the daily rate set by the central bank, limiting both the upside and the downside.
This is actually not the first time China has dropped the peg on the renminbi; it did so in 2005, and the currency jumped 2 percent and continued to rise thereafter. The peg was restored in response to the global economic slowdown in an effort to safeguard domestic manufacturers.
The renminbi is still subject to very strict currency controls. A black market exists, but it is highly illegal and has not reached the same level as, for instance, Venezuela, where a huge number of transactions take place through the parallel market.
Domestically, China is trapped between two opposing forces – the need to remain competitive with foreign manufacturers, and thus secure China’s place as the world’s low-cost factory, and the desire of Chinese citizens to get more for their pay. China’s currency makes imports very expensive, and a burgeoning middle class has grown increasingly fond of foreign luxuries it was once not able to enjoy.
Some economists have calculated that the persistent undervaluation of the renminbi is equivalent to a $1,000 subsidy to every American family, in the form of cheaper goods.
The Financial Times’ Beyond BRICs section believes that Chinese regulators are slowly but surely moving to a floating currency, trying to appease both domestic concerns, which fear becoming uncompetitive, and foreign interests, which are weary of competing with Chinese imports.
“The most common explanation for the sudden flurry of announcements is that the central bank has been battling to win domestic political support for the shift to a more flexible currency, which has been resisted in many quarters,” said the column.
The remninbi’s foreign exchange future thus remains far from clear.
This material is conveyed as a solicitation for entering into a derivatives transaction.
This material has been prepared by a Daniels Trading broker who provides research market commentary and trade recommendations as part of his or her solicitation for accounts and solicitation for trades; however, Daniels Trading does not maintain a research department as defined in CFTC Rule 1.71. Daniels Trading, its principals, brokers and employees may trade in derivatives for their own accounts or for the accounts of others. Due to various factors (such as risk tolerance, margin requirements, trading objectives, short term vs. long term strategies, technical vs. fundamental market analysis, and other factors) such trading may result in the initiation or liquidation of positions that are different from or contrary to the opinions and recommendations contained therein.
Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance. The risk of loss in trading futures contracts or commodity options can be substantial, and therefore investors should understand the risks involved in taking leveraged positions and must assume responsibility for the risks associated with such investments and for their results.
You should carefully consider whether such trading is suitable for you in light of your circumstances and financial resources. You should read the "risk disclosure" webpage accessed at www.DanielsTrading.com at the bottom of the homepage. Daniels Trading is not affiliated with nor does it endorse any trading system, newsletter or other similar service. Daniels Trading does not guarantee or verify any performance claims made by such systems or service.